@tour2ma said: Not sure why I was able to see your post, but since I did... My comment was on our chances of drafting one of each of those groupings... thus my use of "and". Ah! OK.  I would not think we could get a top 3-4 rated OT or DE/LB with the 9th/10th pick in round 2...which would be like #41-42.  High demand positions.  We might get the #3 OG with that pick.